Patients, Not “Customers”
James G. Hutton, PhD
02/01/2006

Patients,
Not “Customers”
By James G. Hutton, PhD
Since
the 1960’s, about the time President Kennedy unveiled his “Consumer Bill of
Rights,” the idea of being a “customer” has been sacred in America. But it’s
time to abandon our faith in the power of consumerism. The United States has
become such a culture of consumption that consumerism is now entrenched even in
the most sacred of our institutions, including education, religion, government
and healthcare. The conse-quences are not pretty.
In medicine, commercialization
and customerization of the American healthcare industry have not brought the
benefits that were promised. If anything, concepts such as managed care, HMOs
and the privatization of hospitals have created more problems than they have
solved, adding new layers of costs and bureaucracy, and often taking medical
decisions out of the hands of people qualified to make those decisions.
Declining
Trust, Especially in Healthcare
During the last 40
years the percentage of Americans who say they have a great deal of confidence
in their institutions has been cut almost in half. From 1966 to 2004, the
percentage of Americans who said they have a great deal of confidence in
American medicine dropped a whopping 41 percentage points, from 73 percent to 32
percent, according to annual polls conducted by Louis Harris & Associates.
Among the major social institutions that were measured — universities, the
military, the media and so forth — only the legal profession and Congress saw
a steeper decline in credibility than the medical field.
The
Source of the Problem — and the Consequences
Much of
the problem is that many Americans falsely believe that treating people as
consumers or customers ensures greater accountability. The reality is usually
the opposite; when institutions like hospitals, schools and churches treat their
patients, students and members as “customers,” those institutions almost
inevitably begin to pander to their audiences, becoming more responsive but to
the wrong things. They lose sight of their basic mission and ultimately become
less accountable.
For example, the steep decline in doctors’ credibility is
partly the result of focusing more on keeping patient-customers happy than on
doing the right thing. Case in point: a study by the Food and Drug
Administration found that 69 percent of physicians prescribed the specific drug
that patients asked for. Worse, more than a million antibiotic prescriptions are
written by doctors each year to treat viral infections.
Another part of the
problem is the prevailing political and economic philosophy in the United States
that looks to the market to solve all of our national problems, from crumbling
prisons to failing schools to spiraling healthcare costs. Unlike true markets
for consumer or industrial products, healthcare markets do not allow free access
to all potential buyers and sellers, they are almost completely circumscribed by
a variety of laws and regulatory agencies, and they do not provide for free and
open access to information such as prices and physician performance.
Treating
healthcare as a market can be damaging not just to patients, but to healthcare
professionals as well. Increasingly, healthcare products and services are being
denigrated and turned into commodities, undermining the value of those products
and the authority of healthcare providers. Audiologists, for example, are being
threatened by calls for hearing aids to be sold over the counter, while
pharmacists are being threatened by Internet sales and direct-mail distribution
of prescription drugs.
The overall result of the customerization of medicine is
that our healthcare system is simply not what it should be, in either reality or
perception.
The Challenge for Nurses
The
customerization and commodification of healthcare has had a limited impact on
the nursing profession thus far. In fact, it appears that nurses have fared
relatively well in terms of credibility, because a significant percentage of
Americans believe that nurses have been truer to their profession than some
other healthcare professionals, and have not been as prone to compromise their
standards for financial gain.
But just as doctors’, audiologists’ and
pharmacists’ credibility, professional authority and earning power are being
challenged by the customerization and commodification of healthcare, so too can
nurses’. One threat is that, in a global economy, nurses can be trained and
imported from other countries in large numbers, as has been the case with
engineers and computer programmers. Another threat is that nurses will be
perceived merely as customer-service providers, rather than professionals.
The
way for nurses to avoid such problems is very simple: Treat patients like
patients, not like customers. That really means two things:
- Treat patients better than you would treat customers. Nurses
should treat patients as something different and something more than | just a
source of revenue for the hospital, clinic or doctor.
- Help give patients what they need, not necessarily what they want.
Giving
people what they need is far more difficult and requires far more courage,
wisdom and leadership than giving people what they want, but it is essential in
maintaining the integrity of any institution or profession.
James
G. Hutton, PhD, is a marketing professor, consultant, speaker, and the author of
The Feel-Good Society: How the “Customer” Metaphor Is Undermining American
Education, Religion, Media and Healthcare (available at Amazon.com). He can be
reached at hutton@fdu.edu.
Share this article: Email,
Slashdot, Digg,
Del.icio.us, Yahoo!MyWeb,
Windows Live Favorites,
Furl
Add this article feed to: RSS, My Yahoo, Newsgator, Bloglines
Read Comments [0]
|
|