WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. — Free drug samples provided to physicians by pharmaceutical companies could actually cost uninsured patients more in the long run, according to a study by researchers at WakeForestUniversityBaptistMedicalCenter and published in the September issue of the Southern Medical Journal. The study looked at the prescribing habits of more than 70 physicians in a university-affiliated internal medicine practice in the months immediately before and after the closing of their drug sample closet. The results indicated that the availability of free samples, including peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux medications, from pharmaceutical companies greatly impacts whether an uninsured patient is given a prescription for a generic or a brand-name drug. Drug samples are available only for brand name drugs, which are often newer, more heavily advertised and almost always much more expensive than generic drugs in the same class. “It’s true that samples can save patients money in the short-run,” said David P. Miller, MD, lead researcher and internal medicine physician at Wake Forest Baptist. “But our study shows that they may end up paying more in the long run when they are given prescriptions for brand-name only drugs.” For the study, researchers used a pharmacy database to track all of the prescriptions in four classes of chronic medications given to uninsured and Medicaid patients. Nearly 2,000 prescriptions categorized as antihypertensives (blood pressure medications), oral diabetic agents, peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux medications, and non-narcotic pain medications, were tracked for the nine months leading up to and following the relocation of the practice, at which time the drug sample closet was permanently closed due to a lack of suitable storage space in the new building. Researchers found that for uninsured patients, the percentage of medications prescribed as generics rose from 12 percent to 30 percent after the clinic closed its drug sample closet. For Medicaid patients, however, there was no significant change in generic prescribing. “The theory is that drug companies hand out samples because it gets physicians in the habit of using a drug and physicians, therefore, are more likely to prescribe that drug later,” Miller said. Researchers were surprised to find that, throughout the study, Medicaid patients were generally prescribed generic drugs, even with the availability of branded samples. Surprising, Miller said, because at the time of the study, Medicaid didn’t have a formulary, so all drugs for Medicaid patients, branded or generic, were only $1. One possible explanation, Miller said, is that because Medicaid patients rarely receive samples, doctors’ prescribing decisions for these patients were based purely on what drug they thought was best and not on what samples happened to be available in the closet. “In terms of safety and effectiveness, doctors have the most information about older drugs because they have been used for years and are often more studied,” Miller said. “Sometimes, doctors don’t discover that a new drug has serious side-effects until it has been used in a large number of people or for a long time.” In recent years, Miller added, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued warnings about some new drugs and a few have been pulled from the market, showing how a promising new drug can later be discovered harmful. “Physicians and medical organizations need to ask themselves if samples are doing more harm than good,” Miller said. “While doctors might intend to help someone by handing them a free sample, in the long run, it could cost them more. Removing samples from a practice can help doctors focus on which medication is best for a patient, rather than which medication happens to be available for free, according to Miller. "Patients who want to save money should ask their doctor if an effective generic medication is available for their condition instead of taking a sample," he said. "In the long run, the generic prescription will probably save them more.”
|